In East Timor: Debating the Constitution in Preparation for a Change of Government
July 11, 2007
On June 30th, East Timor’s citizens cast ballots in the first parliamentary election since independence in 2002. After an intense election campaign in which a record 12 parties and 2 coalitions competed — criss-crossing this small and mountainous half-island nation to hold rallies and conduct door-to-door visits — over 81% of the electorate turned out for a largely peaceful and well-run election day. Results indicate that 7 parties or alliances won seats in the new 65-member Parliament. They help to ensure a pluralistic policymaking process but, with no party winning the 51% needed for a parliamentary majority, the country now faces the daunting challenge of forming a government that will have reasonable prospects for stability and durability over the next five year period.
After a tough first five years of independence, the Timorese are now gaining critical lessons in Constitutional Studies 101. Among political scientists and commentators, avid debate on the meaning and intent of Article 106 in the Constitution is racing over the internet. Political parties are positioning themselves as election results have been certified by the National Election Commission for ratification by the Court of Appeal. President José Ramos-Horta is faced with the weighty and real-life challenge of applying the Constitution to current circumstances and interpreting both the language and intent of the Constitution in carrying out his duty to request formation of the next government. Once the President receives the ratified election results, questions about which party or party alliance should be asked by the President to form the government, and about the President’s responsibility and discretion in making the request, are no longer theoretical.
By virtue of the votes cast on June 30th, two parties gained 21 and 18 seats in the new Parliament, two gained 11 and 8 seats, and three a handful of seats ” none achieving the 33 required for a parliamentary majority. Fretilin, the party that led East Timor’s long struggle for liberation and headed by former prime minister MarÃ Alkatiri, won 29% of the vote – a stunning set-back after its record 57.8% in the 2001 election ” and has argued that the Constitution provides for formation of the government by the party winning the most votes. While the Constitution does seem to allow for a minority government, Fretilin would then be required to forge perpetual parliamentary alliances to gain sufficient votes for approval of its annual budget and all proposed legislation. In contrast, former president Xanana Gusmão’s National Congress for Timorese Reconstruction (CNRT) won 24.1% of the vote, and has proposed an alliance with the Democratic Party (11.3% of the vote) and the coalition of Social Democratic Association of Timor (ASDT) and Social Democrat Party (PSD) (15.8% of the vote), which would achieve a narrow 51% parliamentary majority. Since the Constitution explicitly states that two rejections of annual budgets leads to dissolution of the government and new elections, a unified opposition sets up the ominous specter of a short-lived government that could increase instability in a country still reeling from violent unrest triggered by last year’s events.
Though not flawless, the government’s administration of its first parliamentary election is a credit to East Timor, especially under the daunting circumstances of unseasonably heavy rains that complicated delivery and retrieval of ballot boxes, and a late amendment in the electoral law that shifted ballot counting from scores of polling stations to the 13 district centers. With this accomplishment, the greater historic challenge is formation of a stable government with a sufficient mandate and political legitimacy to deal decisively, transparently, and accountably with the country’s immense challenges. This begins with resolving the complex and sensitive issues surrounding the ongoing political violence that took place in April and May 2006, while tackling the significant developmental needs of this young nation. As political parties carry out the high-level negotiation over coalitions, and authorities deliberate the Constitutional provisions for formation of a new government, ordinary Timorese wait for leaders to deliver on their hopes and aspirations and bring stability, safety, and prosperity to this young democracy.
Katherine S. Hunter is The Asia Foundation’s Country Representative for East Timor.
About our blog, In AsiaIn Asia is a weekly in-depth, in-country resource for readers who want to stay abreast of significant events and issues shaping Asia\’s development, hosted by The Asia Foundation. Drawing on the first-hand insight of over 70 renowned experts in over 20 countries, In Asia delivers concentrated analysis on issues affecting each region of Asia, as well as Foundation-produced reports and polls.
In Asia is posted and distributed every Wednesday evening, Pacific Time and is accessible via email and RSS. If you have any questions, please send an email to [email protected].
ContactFor questions about In Asia, or for our cross-post and re-use policy, please send an email to [email protected].
The Asia Foundation
465 California St., 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
PO Box 193223
San Francisco, CA 94119-3223
THE LATEST ACROSS ASIA
Carnegie India Centre: Asian Views on America’s Role in Asia
February 27, 2017
The Asia Foundation Partners with MasterCard and Vietnam Bank for Social Policies on Mobile Banking Service
February 23, 2017
The Power of the Political Voice: Women as Voters, Candidates and Activists
Wednesday, March 22, 2017
Better Legal Education Key to Strengthening Rule of Law in Afghanistan
February 22, 2017
Six Stories, Six Paths to Development Online Platforms as Drivers of Inclusive Growth
February 20, 2017
President Trump and the Future of US-Asia Relations: A View from the West Coast
Tuesday, March 7, 2017
Asian Views on America's Role in Asia
Recommendations for the Incoming U.S. President on Policy Towards Asia