In China: Celebrating Earth Hour
April 15, 2009
When the lights went off one night late last month at Beijing’s “Bird’s Nest” Olympic stadium (officially known as the National Stadium) and the Water Cube, it did not signal the end of the country’s glory surrounding all things Olympic. Rather, it signaled a commitment to protect the environment and combat new climate change. This was the first time ever that China participated in the March 28 Earth Hour activities that included switching off lights at landmark structures throughout the city. Besides Beijing, 18 other Chinese cities – including Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Wuhan – joined the effort. Turning the lights out reflects Chinese businesses’ and ordinary citizens’ increasing awareness of environmental issues.
The attention given to environmental protection is not only coming from the bottom up. Just a week earlier, national television highlighted President Hu Jintao, Premier Wen Jiabao, and six other top Chinese leaders as they visited the “Energy Saving Emissions Reduction and New Energy Science and Technology Expo” in Beijing. Their action sent a strong signal that the Chinese central government recognizes the importance of environmental protection and clean energy. With support for environmental protection coming from the top, it is more likely that not only the central government system but also local governments will gradually embrace President Hu’s “scientific concept of development,” an effort to balance economic growth with natural environment protection.
Last month, at the 2009 National People’s Congress, Premier Wen Jiabao announced China’s progress in promoting energy efficiency and emissions reduction. Compared to 2007, energy consumption per unit of GDP fell by 4.59 percent in 2008, while sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and chemical oxygen demand (COD) fell by 5.95 percent and 4.42 percent, respectively. These figures show lower energy consumption and lower emissions than the previous two years when China started to implement the 11th Five-Year Plan, which set targets to reduce energy consumption per unit of GDP by 20 percent by 2010, and reduce SO2 emissions and COD levels by 10% by 2010, compared to 2005.
While these examples point to progress in China’s environmental management and sustainable development efforts at both the grassroots and highest government levels, some wonder if these achievements are instead just side effects of the financial crisis and accompanying slowdown in economic activity. The global financial crisis has resulted in the closure of many factories, especially export-oriented ones, and therefore emissions from these have indeed been reduced. Since the economic recovery is likely to take some time, near-term environmental pollution is likely to be reduced during this period of lower production. However, the economic crisis could shift priorities from environmental protection to stimulating the economy. This worries some because it could mean the prospects for future energy conservation and energy protection are not promising.
Adding to these concerns, at the National People’s Congress session in March, the central government also announced that investment in sustainable development was cut by 40 percent in China’s 4 trillion RMB yuan (about $586 billion dollars) economic stimulus plan. Compared to the original plan, which came out in November 2008, investment in sustainable development was scaled down from 350 billion RMB yuan, or 8.7 percent of the overall plan, to 210 billion RMB yuan, representing just 5.2 percent of the plan. Projects that fall under sustainable development include: wastewater treatment facilities, solid waste disposal facilities, pollution prevention and treatment in key rivers, reforestation, and energy efficiency engineering. Environmentalists hope that other areas of the stimulus plan, such as public infrastructure and technology advancement, might reflect environmental protection needs, but as of last month, 104 billion RMB yuan worth of projects under the stimulus plan failed to pass environmental impact assessments and were put on hold. This includes projects that were too energy intensive, might threaten drinking water sources, or damage nature reserves. (Projects totaling 970 billion RMB yuan did pass environmental impact assessments.).
While this demonstrates that environmental impact assessments – required by the Ministry of Environment – are being performed and heeded to, it also reflects that there remains a considerable lack of attention to environmental protection during project design. On the enterprise side, the financial crisis has made it harder for businesses to get loans and make investments in environmental measures. If enterprises have to balance meeting the demands of economic survival, paying workers the minimum wage, and also protecting the environment, it is likely that environmental protection measures will be the first to go. In addition, with the government’s strong commitment to economic recovery, local governments are likely to loosen the enforcement of environmental protection regulations.
In spite of this, there are still some promising signs of the longer term prospects for China to achieve environmental sustainability.
Beijing citizens’ enthusiastic participation in Earth Hour reflects a growing public interest in the environment. There are more forums and workshops discussing “clean-tech,” and many top executives from China’s leading companies have committed to attend the 2nd “China’s Green Companies Annual Meeting” in Beijing from April 22-23. Together with Beijing-based Global Environmental Institute, The Asia Foundation’s China program recently launched an environmental entrepreneurship training project. It is exciting to see emerging entrepreneurs so enthusiastic about finding business solutions to the environmental problems and including environmental protection in their business plans.
China’s environmental challenges cannot be solved without policy changes that encourage environmentally friendly enterprises and discourage polluting ones. However, more entrepreneurs and employees in environmentally friendly businesses could gradually encourage progressive environmental practices and policies. And that could leave a lasting impact for China’s environment, one that the country could be as proud of as it was of the Olympics.
Mr. Zhao Lijian is The Asia Foundation’s Environment Program Manager in Beijing where he develops and manages projects including a Pearl River Delta initiative focusing on cleaner production in the industrial sector, clean water, and environmental entrepreneurship training. He is a LEAD (Leadership for Environment and Development) Fellow and holds a MSc. degree in Environmental Sciences, Policy, and Management from the International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE), Lund University in Sweden. He can be reached at [email protected].
About our blog, In AsiaIn Asia is a weekly in-depth, in-country resource for readers who want to stay abreast of significant events and issues shaping Asia's development, hosted by The Asia Foundation. Drawing on the first-hand insight of over 70 renowned experts in over 20 countries, In Asia delivers concentrated analysis on issues affecting each region of Asia, as well as Foundation-produced reports and polls.
In Asia is posted and distributed every Wednesday evening, Pacific Time and is accessible via email and RSS. If you have any questions, please send an email to [email protected].
ContactFor questions about In Asia, or for our cross-post and re-use policy, please send an email to [email protected].
The Asia Foundation
465 California St., 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
PO Box 193223
San Francisco, CA 94119-3223
THE LATEST ACROSS ASIA
2016 Survey of the Afghan People Release in Kabul and Washington, DC
December 7, 2016
The Evolving Role of Women in a Politically Uncertain Afghanistan
December 7, 2016
Education a ‘Beacon of Hope’ in Afghanistan
December 7, 2016
The Washington Post: Survey finds Afghans more pessimistic on security, future
December 7, 2016
Afghanistan in 2016: A Survey of the Afghan People
The longest-running nationwide survey of Afghan attitudes and opinions