The Psychological Cost of Sri Lanka’s Civil War
September 18, 2013
On September 21, residents of Sri Lanka’s war-torn Northern Province will vote in the first provincial council elections of the region. The event is significant for the former conflict zone – the hardest-hit province in the country, scarred from 26 years of violent fighting and military rule.
On a recent trip to the North, there was little indication of the violent war that was such a palpable part of the region just a few years back. Save for some ruins in the form of dilapidated houses and singed trees, the occasional war monument, and military personnel, the turbulent past seemed to be fading. In Jaffna, newly built roads link the capital to the rest of the country. For a town that was under curfew during the climax of the civil war (from August 2006 to May 2009), it is remarkable to observe the number of people who come out of their homes after dark, strolling on new sidewalks lit by streetlights. These developments are very positive; at the same time they are relatively skin deep: wars, conflicts, and the violence they wreak form deep scars in the psyche of society which are not as immediately visible. The final stages of the war left many citizens of the North displaced, disabled, and living in refugee camps with a complete loss of their source of livelihood. Sadness, fear, agitation, and inability to sleep or eat well are only some of the ongoing symptoms that these survivors grapple with every day.
In 2005, when the country was in the midst of a ceasefire and still recovering from the 2004 tsunami, The Asia Foundation partnered with local NGOs to begin a program which we then called “Reducing the Effects and Incidences of Trauma (RESIST),” that focused on raising awareness for the needs of survivors of conflict-related violence and trauma and helped to set up clinical service centers. The country context changed drastically in 2006, when open war broke out again between the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE) and the army, creating a volatile work environment and the need to shift the focus of our program. In 2009, the Sri Lankan Army declared victory, ending the war and enabling access to regions and communities in the North that were previously inaccessible. During this time, we shifted our concentration to improving the quality of psychosocial services, such as counseling, medical support, physiotherapy, relaxation techniques, raising awareness of the consequences of conflict-related violence, and assistance with referrals for our two main NGO partners, the Family Rehabilitation Centre (FRC) and the Association for Health and Counselling (Shanthiham). To address the emerging needs of the large-scale displacement, loss of lives, and livelihoods that took place during the immediate post-conflict period, we established partnerships with the government psychosocial service providers for a more sustainable and wider reach of services.
Now, four years after the war ended, taking into account the socio-political landscape of the post-war climate, we are shifting from a “crisis intervention approach” to a “post-conflict approach” through the Victims of Trauma Treatment Program (VTTP). In a more secure, mobile environment, the space and opportunity to provide better clinical services and expand our reach has increased.
Over the last eight years, the project has assisted 11,387 clients. As a part of the post-conflict approach, we have increased collaboration with government sector service providers such as the National Institute of Mental Health, the College of Psychiatrists, the Ministry of Social Services, and the National Institute of Social Development in a bid to institutionalize psychosocial service provision. A major focus of the entire program and especially VTTP is to build the organizational capacity of FRC and Shanthiham through administrative and clinical support. This has been a slow process, but as VTTP draws to an end, both organizations now possess the capacity to manage organizational and clinical resources independently.
Mihiri Ferdinando is a program manager and Asnah Anver is an intern, both for The Asia Foundation’s Victims of Trauma Treatment Project in Sri Lanka. Ferdinando can be reached at [email protected]. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the individual authors and not those of The Asia Foundation.
About our blog, In AsiaIn Asia is a weekly in-depth, in-country resource for readers who want to stay abreast of significant events and issues shaping Asia's development, hosted by The Asia Foundation. Drawing on the first-hand insight of over 70 renowned experts in over 20 countries, In Asia delivers concentrated analysis on issues affecting each region of Asia, as well as Foundation-produced reports and polls.
In Asia is posted and distributed every Wednesday evening, Pacific Time and is accessible via email and RSS. If you have any questions, please send an email to [email protected].
ContactFor questions about In Asia, or for our cross-post and re-use policy, please send an email to [email protected].
The Asia Foundation
465 California St., 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
PO Box 193223
San Francisco, CA 94119-3223
THE LATEST ACROSS ASIA
Columbia University Weatherhead East Asian Institute: “Asian Views on America’s Role in Asia:” Video and Photos
December 2, 2016
NPR: Amid Economic Crisis, Mongolians Risk Their Lives For Do-It-Yourself Mining
December 1, 2016
Research Reveals Cambodian Television Rife with Depictions of Violence Against Women
November 30, 2016
Charter Outlines 10 Actions to Prevent Violence Against Women and Children in Timor-Leste
November 30, 2016
Asia Foundation Releases Study of Private Perceptions of Corruption (STOPP) in Mongolia
November 30, 2016
Public Program: The Asia Foundation’s 2016 Survey of the Afghan People
Wednesday, December 7, 2016
Asian Views on America’s Role in Asia: The Future of the Rebalance
Recommendations for the incoming U.S. president on policy toward Asia