How Politics Can Outmaneuver Reform in the Philippines
March 12, 2014
Over the past two years, the Philippines has achieved the distinction of being the fastest growing of the ASEAN-6 economies with growth rates of 6.8 percent in 2012 and 7.2 percent in 2013. The official poverty rate in the Philippines was 27.9 percent in 2012 and 28.8 percent in 2006; levels which were interpreted this way by the Philippines Statistics Authority: “Poverty remained unchanged as the computed differences are not statistically significant.” Clearly, some are being left behind despite all the growth.
The country faces serious institutional and systemic governance issues, and recent events, such as the pork barrel scandal that exposed lawmakers’ misuse of public funds, underscore how weak institutions can hamper growth and development, and how politics can outmaneuver efforts for reform.
There is increasing recognition by the international development community that politics, power, coalitions, collective action, and leadership are central elements of development. But navigating the transition from policies and programming practice that were originally designed to deliver technical assistance to those that explicitly incorporate the political dimensions of development is the current challenge confronting development professionals and agencies.
The Asia Foundation, in partnership with the Australian Aid and the Developmental Leadership Program (DLP), just released a new book, Room for Maneuver: Social Sector Policy Reform in the Philippines, that examines the inherently political nature of reforms in development and the intricacies of social sector policy reform and the “maneuvers” undertaken to achieve genuine reform in the Philippines.
This new book, a follow on to case studies featured in an earlier book published by the Foundation about the politics of economic policy reform in the Philippines, highlights four case studies:
- The successful passage of the Anti-Violence Against Women and their Children Act in 2004 that criminalizes all forms of violence against women in intimate relationships;
- The successful passage of the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act in 2012 that seeks to ensure universal access to information on family planning and maternal care;
- The politics of introducing and passing the Governance of Basic Education Act in 2001 that altered the organizational structure of the national educational system; and
- The thus far unsuccessful effort to introduce a Freedom of Information Act that establishes legal procedures for obtaining government-held information.
From these, the editors and writers draw a series of lessons to help inform programs and strategies, including:
- Effective coalitions and networks are essential to reform. In each of the successful reform cases studied, there were strong bonds between civil society reformers and groups within government that were critical for success. Reformers had to develop good relationships with key internal players in the executive and legislative branches. There is a growing literature of the importance of coalitions and networks in achieving reform.
- Passionate, well-connected leaders drive change. While networks and coalitions provide credibility and support for the reform initiatives, they are driven and sustained by key individuals whose ideologies, history, personal networks, and important positions in society and government enable them to be effective leaders. Many of the leaders toiled and struggled for years to achieve their goals. In a number of cases, there was no donor support but they persevered.
- The role of values and motivations in reform coalitions can vary. The importance of having shared values and motivations among all reform coalition members is unclear. Some advocates believe that successful reform is achieved by establishing a shared set of clearly articulated values that can serve as a basis for coalition unity and longevity. To others, the importance of building a formal coalition based on a consensus of core values is unnecessary. The key is the willingness of coalition members to use their political capital toward the same reform regardless of their motivation or values.
- Reform strategies require flexibility. While policy reform needs to be well planned, advocates should also be able to quickly adjust to shifting political realities and change tactics as needed on the fly. Changing realities may call for compromises, and advocates need to be ready to compromise, keeping in mind their critical set of technically sound non-negotiable provisions. Since some reforms challenge current deeply embedded beliefs in the existing political culture, advocates should be willing to experiment with different political strategy mixes.
- External technical and financial support can be helpful. Policy advocacy can be an expensive battle and reform advocates often work with very limited funds. Support from donors can make a great difference. By the same token, donors need to be sensitive to the needs and preferences of the reformers and not to impose overly onerous conditions on them. An effective understanding of local political economy considerations will help donors make better, more informed choices.
- Align the stars and connect the dots. Successful social sector reform requires interlinked political, public, and advocacy constituencies to come together. A president is unlikely to spend his or her political capital on a bill that does not have clear public support or a high probability of passing both Houses of Congress. Leaders and advocacy groups that are unable to spark the public interest, line up political reform champions, and stay united behind a core common platform, often over many years, are almost certain to fail.
It is our hope that development agencies and practitioners draw on these cases so that they are more effectively able to contribute to genuine reform in the Philippines and elsewhere.
Contributors to Room for Maneuver include Adrian Leftwich, Raul Fabella, Jaime Faustino, Andrew Parker, Abigail de la Cruz, Michelle Domingo, Jerryll Reyes, Purple Romero, Jamir Ocampo, and Riza Halili. The book is in memory of Adrian Leftwich.
Jaime Faustino manages The Asia Foundation’s Economic Reform and Development Entrepreneurship Program in the Philippines. He can be reached at [email protected] The views and opinions expressed here are those of the individual author and not those of The Asia Foundation.
About our blog, In AsiaIn Asia is a weekly in-depth, in-country resource for readers who want to stay abreast of significant events and issues shaping Asia's development, hosted by The Asia Foundation. Drawing on the first-hand insight of over 70 renowned experts in over 20 countries, In Asia delivers concentrated analysis on issues affecting each region of Asia, as well as Foundation-produced reports and polls.
In Asia is posted and distributed every Wednesday evening, Pacific Time and is accessible via email and RSS. If you have any questions, please send an email to [email protected].
ContactFor questions about In Asia, or for our cross-post and re-use policy, please send an email to [email protected].
The Asia Foundation
465 California St., 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
PO Box 193223
San Francisco, CA 94119-3223
THE LATEST ACROSS ASIA
Columbia University Weatherhead East Asian Institute: “Asian Views on America’s Role in Asia:” Video and Photos
December 2, 2016
NPR: Amid Economic Crisis, Mongolians Risk Their Lives For Do-It-Yourself Mining
December 1, 2016
Research Reveals Cambodian Television Rife with Depictions of Violence Against Women
November 30, 2016
Charter Outlines 10 Actions to Prevent Violence Against Women and Children in Timor-Leste
November 30, 2016
Asia Foundation Releases Study of Private Perceptions of Corruption (STOPP) in Mongolia
November 30, 2016
Public Program: The Asia Foundation’s 2016 Survey of the Afghan People
Wednesday, December 7, 2016
Asian Views on America’s Role in Asia: The Future of the Rebalance
Recommendations for the incoming U.S. president on policy toward Asia