INASIA

Weekly Insights and Analysis

Mongolia’s Small-Scale Miners Play Critical Role in Safeguarding Natural Resources

October 12, 2016

By Bolormaa Purevjav, Jonathan Stacey

Over the last two decades, Mongolia’s mining industry has supported the country’s economic and industrialization agenda, catapulting the country to one of the world’s fastest growing economies in 2013. According to government statistics, mining and quarrying accounted for 23 percent of GDP in 2014, and by May 2015, mineral exports accounted for 87 percent of total exports. However, the industry’s rush to expand has come at a significant cost to the environment and the country’s fragile natural resources.

Mongolia mining

According to government statistics, mining and quarrying accounted for 23 percent of GDP in 2014, but it has taken a toll on the country’s natural resources. Photo/Tenzing Paljor

Mining exploitation has led to rapid soil erosion and degradation of both pastureland and watercourses, and as a result, has drastically altered the traditional livelihoods of local agrarian communities, many of whom still rely on conventional animal husbandry. This has created an “unwanted new world” which has forced local communities in many areas to make a tough choice: either to adapt and tolerate or to flee and seek refuge in urban centers.

To make matters worse, an ongoing economic downturn due to a significant drop in foreign direct investment in the mining sector, as well as low commodity prices globally, has fueled a rise in unemployment, and resulted in an increase in small-scale artisanal mining (ASM) activity in the country. There are an estimated 100,000 small-scale artisanal miners who work independently and comprise nearly 20 percent of Mongolia’s rural workforce. In 2015, the ASM sector (including some small companies) sold 6.7 tons of gold to the Bank of Mongolia, which represented an impressive 46.3 percent of total gold-mining sales.

Although legalized, ASM remains a widely controversial issue here. Rangeland degradation, increased desertification, water pollution, localized mercury use, reduced river levels, and landscape destruction are the main environmental issues associated with ASM. Illegal artisanal mining in the country’s Protected Areas is an increasingly contested issue.

artisanal miners

While large-scale mining operations often make headlines, there are an estimated 100,000 small-scale artisanal miners who work independently and make up nearly 20 percent of Mongolia’s rural workforce. Photo/: Marieke Heemskerk

The main issues surrounding ASM lie on two fronts. From a social perspective, traditional artisanal miners work in incredibly harsh and hazardous conditions, usually at great expense to their health. On the environmental front, thousands of unfilled deep pits, tunnels, and waste—a consequence of this type of mining—are degrading the land, soil, and hydrology, and posing a real danger to animals and people.

According to the Mongolian government, 40 percent of abandoned mining degraded land can be attributed to ASM. In particular, extensive areas of open shafts, compacted soil, loss of vegetation and topsoil, and polluted water all degrade the value of pasturelands and impact wildlife. But for the artisanal miners who lack the necessary knowledge, financial resources, and technical capacity, rehabilitating the land themselves is in most cases challenging and prohibitive.

Thousands of unfilled deep pits, tunnels, and waste—a consequence of ASM—are degrading the land, soil, and hydrology, and posing a real danger to animals and people.

Thousands of unfilled deep pits, tunnels, and waste—a consequence of ASM—are degrading the land, soil, and hydrology, and posing a real danger to animals and people.

The Asia Foundation’s Engaging Stakeholders in Environmental Conservation Project (ESEC II), funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), has been working since 2013 to mitigate the negative environmental impacts of past and present mining practices. The project promotes the development of sound environmental practices at the local level to ensure that communities live in a healthy and safe environment and, at the same time, ensures that the employment opportunities that ASM creates are not taken away.

Throughout 2014‑15, we supported 17 frugal rehabilitation demonstration projects, and in 2016, through a co-financing initiative, local governments implemented 13 additional frugal rehabilitation projects. Today, a total of 210 hectares of land has been rehabilitated by 23 ASM NGOs across the country.

Now that the project has come to a close, it’s helpful to look at some of the key areas of impact and lessons learned:

Involvement of artisanal miners is crucial. In the 17 frugal environmental rehabilitation demonstration (FRD) projects, over 900 artisanal miners rehabilitated 143 hectares of land at sites representative of 12 out of 16 ecological zones across Mongolia. Through these projects, community understanding of the value of the environment was strengthened and dialogue among stakeholders proved to be constructive. Going forward, engagement of artisanal miners in rehabilitation should be continued as best practice.

Local government must be involved. ASM NGOs have implemented FRD projects in close cooperation with local governments. Frugal rehabilitation projects have provided important creditability for local artisanal miners, and provided them with much-needed experience in both technical and biological rehabilitation of degraded lands, including how to improve the organic content of the soil using locally available dung and manure; how to increase the survival of planted trees or seeds by protecting them from the wind and cold; and how to identify local plants and collect and store their seeds. Engagement of local government is also critical in ensuring the long-term sustainability of rehabilitation efforts.

The national government must also be involved. Policy is fundamental to promoting the continuation of environmental rehabilitation best practices and transforming artisanal miners into rehabilitators. The ongoing capacity-building of citizens on environmental rehabilitation, oversight, and evaluation are essential to achieving inclusive and sustainable development and the fostering of democratic governance. Some of this political will is becoming evident and needs to be further cultivated. For example, Mr. Davaadorj, head of Policy Implementation and Coordination Department, Ministry of Mining and Heavy Industry (MMHI), stated that the Ministry will continue its efforts to amend current ASM regulations and attach the Frugal Rehabilitation Methodology (FRM) to it. The Mineral Resources and Petroleum Authority of Mongolia (MRPAM) has also identified three commitments to undertake: Combine efforts with MMHI to amend ASM regulations to include FRM; implement FR projects in ASM abandoned areas with local government, and to register rehabilitated areas by artisanal miners into an ASM information database. These commitments need to be seen through, and policies and regulations that incorporate environmental management need to be passed and implemented.

Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) need to be taken forward. The EMPs developed under this project through Local Multi-Stakeholder Councils (LMCs) are crucial and innovative participatory models for local environmental governance. These tools have been officially approved by local governments throughout the country, and there is strong local ownership over these plans. EMPs should be used as the main tool to guide each district in its local sustainable development. The work conducted to ensure that there was local buy-in for these tools and demonstrations of their effectiveness must continue to be supported, and government funding should be secured so that they can be properly implemented.

By the end of the project, ASM communities in at least in 25 districts across Mongolia have the experience and capacity to do rehabilitation of ASM degraded the land. In 2016, 13 more local governments came on board, and co-financed 13 projects rehabilitating 70 hectares of ASM-degraded land. If this approach continues, Mongolia will not only see a more secure environmental future, but also an improved economic one.

Bolormaa Purevjav is The Asia Foundation’s Mongolia Environment Program director and Jonathan Stacey manages The Asia Foundation’s Engaging Stakeholders in Environmental Conservation Project Phase II. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the individual authors and not those of The Asia Foundation or its funders.

1 Comment

  1. Excellent write up, Bolormaa! So proud of you!

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

About our blog, InAsia

InAsia is a weekly in-depth, in-country resource for readers who want to stay abreast of significant events and issues shaping Asia\’s development, hosted by The Asia Foundation. Drawing on the first-hand insight of over 70 renowned experts in over 20 countries, InAsia delivers concentrated analysis on issues affecting each region of Asia, as well as Foundation-produced reports and polls.

InAsia is posted and distributed every Wednesday evening, Pacific Time and is accessible via email and RSS. If you have any questions, please send an email to editor.inasia@asiafoundation.org.

Contact

For questions about InAsia, or for our cross-post and re-use policy, please send an email to editor.inasia@asiafoundation.org.

The Asia Foundation
465 California St., 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104


Mailing Address:
PO Box 193223
San Francisco, CA 94119-3223