From Afghanistan: New Policy Recommendations
January 7, 2009
Last week, The Asia Foundation released State Building, Security, and Social Change in Afghanistan: Reflections on a Survey of the Afghan People, a collection of six essays that analyze in-depth the findings of the largest public opinion survey ever conducted in Afghanistan. The survey, Afghanistan in 2008: A Survey of the Afghan People, was preceded by similar surveys in 2004, 2006, and 2007. All essays in this analytical volume inform the Afghanistan policy debate currently under way. In doing so, they provide different perceptions on the complex governance environment of Afghanistan and offer policy advice with a long-term view.
The volume, in addition to the 2008 Afghan public opinion poll on which it is based, can be downloaded in its entirety at: http://www.asiafoundation.org/country/afghanistan/2008-poll.php.
To interpret the 2008 survey’s findings, The Asia Foundation brought together nine expert analysts on political, social, and developmental issues in Afghanistan and the region: RAND Political Scientist Seth Jones; Australian National University Professor William Maley; University of California (Irvine) Professor Russell Dalton; New School Professor Sanjay Ruparelia; Asia Foundation technical consultants Sudhindra Sharma and Pawan Sen; and Asia Foundation advisors Najla Ayubi, Harjot Kaur, and Ruth Rennie.
Through careful study and interpretation of data collected for the 2008 survey, these analysts identified long-term trends and their implications for Afghanistan’s future. For instance, more Afghans now understand democracy in terms of fundamental political rights, feel politically efficacious, and believe that democracy is compatible with Islam. Yet these gains in social attitudes are mitigated by an erosion of public confidence in democracy, and increasing dissatisfaction with the way it is working in Afghanistan, largely caused by the failure of government institutions to provide effective responses to people’s needs for security, and economic and social development.
Collectively, the six essays set out a list of priorities for the Afghan government and the international community. In the near-term, these include improved security, accompanied by the continued reinforcement of the capacity of Afghan government institutions to deliver justice, democratic representation, and economic and social development. Alongside this, continued investment must be made in fostering positive change in social attitudes through education and increased citizen participation in governance and development. The experts agree that building sustainable partnerships between government and Afghan communities lies at the heart of the challenge of state-building in Afghanistan.
Financial support for this publication came from the U.S. Agency for International Development. The views of the contributors to this volume do not reflect the views of The Asia Foundation or of the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Countries: Afghanistan
Write a comment:
Comments are moderated. Please be polite and on-topic.

The Timor-Leste Legal Education Project, in partnership with The Asia Foundation and Stanford Law School, just launched a brand-new website that provides accessible, legal educational textbooks to help build knowledge in Timorese universities, government institutions, and NGOs. Recently, the project developed the
