Insights and Analysis
New Article Explores Electoral Systems in Emerging Democracies
January 25, 2012
“The choice of an electoral system must not be taken lightly. … Far too often in transitional or developing settings, the choice of a system is the work of a lamentably small group of people who then enshrine their decision in a constitution adopted after a sketchy public debate held in a context where few have a full grasp of the long-term significance of electoral-system design,” writes The Asia Foundation’s director for Elections and Political Processes, Timothy M. Meisburger, in a new article, “Getting Majoritarianism Wrong,” published in the January issue of Journal of Democracy. Meisburger, who wrote the article while on sabbatical as a World Learning Democracy Fellow at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), challenges popular assumptions around electoral systems, particularly that emerging democracies are better off with an electoral system based on proportional representation. Written just as the Arab Spring unrest erupted in the Middle East, Meisburger draws on previous experience with similar democratic transitions in South Africa, Indonesia, and Timor-Leste to examine developing democracies in the Middle East and North Africa. Download the full article.
About our blog, InAsia
InAsia is posted and distributed every other Wednesday evening, Pacific Time. If you have any questions, please send an email to [email protected].
Contact
For questions about InAsia, or for our cross-post and re-use policy, please send an email to [email protected].The Asia Foundation
465 California St., 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Mailing Address:
PO Box 193223
San Francisco, CA 94119-3223
The Latest Across Asia
Publication
June 29, 2022
News
June 27, 2022
Program Snapshot
June 23, 2022
Change Starts Here Campaign Impact
Thank you for powering The Asia Foundation’s mission to improve lives and expand opportunities.
0 Comments