Insights and Analysis

The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Covid-19, and Women

March 16, 2022

By Eun Mee Kim and Niki Baroy

While it is common knowledge that the Covid-19 pandemic has reversed decades of progress on the Sustainable Development Goals, the backsliding in key areas had already begun prior to early 2020. In 2019, the United Nations reported negative trends in the following areas: “rising inequalities, climate change, biodiversity loss, and increasing amounts of waste from human activity that are overwhelming capacities to process them.” For these trends, particularly increasing inequalities, it seems that the pandemic has entrenched them further, with specific concerns over rising gender inequality in the Global South.

Even prior to the pandemic, the gender and geographical disparity in the knowledge production sector was evident. The percentage of female researchers improved across all regions, except for Central and Eastern Europe, from 2014 to 2017 (figure 1). The progress in regional averages also translated to a rise in the global percentage, from 28 percent to 30 percent, during this period. This is a win for female researchers worldwide. However, it is important to acknowledge that, for regions like East Asia and the Pacific and South and West Asia, females accounted for only a quarter or less of all researchers in 2017.

The picture is even more dismal if we consider the disparity between the Global North and the Global South. Of more than 24,800 papers in high-profile development journals from 1990 to 2019, 73 percent were authored by researchers in the Global North, even though 62 percent of these papers were focused on a country or region in the Global South.

The rapid pace of technological development—the “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” or 4IR—is another area of rising inequalities, leading to widening technological and economic divides between the Global North and the Global South and between men and women. The gender gap is particularly evident in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and artificial intelligence (AI).

In South Korea in 2019, women accounted for only 21 percent of people working in STEM research and development. Similarly, in Australia, women accounted for less than 30 percent of the academic research workforce in STEM. Figure 2 shows the relationship between the female share of STEM occupations and the female share of STEM tertiary graduates in 2020. Research has demonstrated that gender norms and stereotypes contribute to inequities in tertiary education, particularly in STEM.

As women enter the workforce, they are also met with “glass ceilings” and “sticky floors,” the latter being a phenomenon in which women and ethnic minorities are stuck in low-paying jobs with little to no possibility for lateral or vertical career moves. These career impediments also pervade the STEM field. It is evident that there are more deep-seated and systemic factors at play.

While the trends mentioned above preceded Covid-19, the pandemic has served to further embed them. In South Korea, 137,000 women lost their jobs in 2020, compared to 82,000 men, and married women were disproportionately affected. The Australian context is similar, with 8 percent of women having lost their jobs at the peak of the pandemic compared to 4 percent of men.

A dramatic rise in women’s care burden was noted in countries worldwide, including Bangladesh, Lao PDR, Mongolia, Pakistan, and Vietnam, where women have struggled to juggle caring and domestic work with employment and income-generating opportunities. In many cases, this has resulted in an erosion of their resilience, raising concerns over their ability to bounce back in the long term. In South Korea, a similar trend was observed, with over 56 percent of women reporting increased care work during the first half of 2020.

The pandemic has sharpened the focus on these systemic inequalities. As climate-related disasters increase in frequency, especially in the Global South, the world is likely to witness more shocks and crises in the future. With these impending threats, policymakers and institutions must rethink and reshape their approach to inequality in order to build more resilient societies.

First, the issue of gender inequality must be tackled throughout the life cycle by looking at the existing challenges that women face, including lack of access to services and education, unpaid care work, and uneven power relations between genders. Covid-19 has exacerbated these prevailing issues and will continue to hamper women’s empowerment if not addressed immediately.

Second, an intersectional framework should be employed to understand how different identity markers such as gender, race, and class overlap and impact different people’s ability to bounce back from disaster. This approach should be considered in all local and international policy decisions. In addition, greater investment in data and information infrastructures must be made to improve access to data disaggregated by age, sex, and other identity markers.

Third, further investment in inclusive digital infrastructure is required, to allow people to participate more directly in policymaking, particularly those who are often excluded from these discussions.

Lastly, access to information and communication technology must also be improved, especially in areas with high concentrations of vulnerability and poverty, since women and girls, persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples, and other marginalized groups are most likely to feel the impacts of the digital divide.

If we adopt these approaches, we can move towards a more data-oriented, science-based, and people-driven recovery, and build resilience against future shocks and crises.

Professor Eun Mee Kim is the 17th president of Ewha Womans University in Seoul, South Korea, the world largest women’s educational institute, and a recipient of The Asia Foundation’s Leadership Award for advancing our collective vision for a better world. Niki Baroy is a research assistant at The Asia Foundation and a social researcher at the Western Sydney Regional Information and Research Service. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors, not those of The Asia Foundation.

This essay, which first appeared in DevPolicy, is based on the first presentation at the 2022 AAC Speaker Series, a new monthly online event cohosted by The Asia Foundation the Development Policy Centre at the Australian National University. Watch Professor Eun Mee Kim present The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Covid-19, and women.


About our blog, InAsia

InAsia is a bi-weekly in-depth, in-country resource for readers who want to stay abreast of significant events and issues shaping Asia’s development, hosted by The Asia Foundation. Drawing on the first-hand insight of renowned experts, InAsia delivers concentrated analysis on issues affecting each region of Asia, as well as Foundation-produced reports and polls.

InAsia is posted and distributed every other Wednesday evening, Pacific Time. If you have any questions, please send an email to [email protected].


For questions about InAsia, or for our cross-post and re-use policy, please send an email to [email protected].

The Asia Foundation
465 California St., 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104

The Latest Across Asia

2024 Lotus Leadership Awards

The Lotus Leadership Awards recognize contributions towards gender equality in Asia and the Pacific