In The News

Families, Not Political Parties Still Reign in the Philippines

May 22, 2013

There has been some controversy about the quality of the May 2013 general elections in the Philippines, during which some 18,000 local and national positions were elected. But the fairest verdict of this exercise in electronic voting would seem to be that, like in May 2010, elections changed, but politics didn’t. As always, discussing the May elections inevitably involves talking about families and personalities but not political parties.

Manny Pacquiao's wife Jinkee Pacquiao files her certificate of candidacy on Tuesday, October 2.

Manny Pacquiao’s wife Jinkee Pacquiao files her certificate of candidacy on Tuesday, October 2. Photo by Cocoy Sexcion.

When it comes to the nationally elected upper house of the legislature – the Senate – much has been made of the fact that nine of the 12 winners came from President Aquino’s slate, dubbed “Team PNoy.” It’s important to note that from the start, this was not a group of Liberal Party (LP) members – only three candidates were Liberal Party members (and of those, only one had been a Liberal Party member for more than a few months). The rest are from the LP’s coalition partners, the Nacionalista Party, Nationalist People’s Coalition, Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas ng Bayan (PDP-Laban), and Laban ng Demokratikong Pilipino.

In the end, the only LP winner was the newly minted member Bam Aquino, a first cousin of President Aquino with a distinguished NGO career. Other newcomers to the Senate were topnotcher Grace Poe (daughter of the late Fernando Poe Jr., defeated 2004 presidential candidate), Nancy Binay (daughter of Vice President Jejomar Binay), Sonny Angara (son of outgoing Senator Eduardo Angara), Cynthia Villar (wife of outgoing Senator Manual Villar), and JV Ejercito (son of former president, and newly elected Manila Mayor Joseph “Erap” Estrada). The pattern is obvious, and replicated throughout the archipelago for many offices – mayors and governors, members of Congress, and local council members.

In a post on this blog last year, I examined the fate of political families in Philippine history. One of those examined was the Dimaporos of Lanao del Norte, which in 2013 continued their unbroken hold on the province with husband Abdullah (the second generation of the dynasty) and wife Imelda being the two elected representatives, and their son Khalid the governor. Another was the Durano clan of Danao City in Cebu, which in 2013 continued their bewildering internecine competition as brother bested brother and nephew defeated uncle.

As witness the Durano imbroglio, being a political family is not necessarily a secure position. Some prominent political clans suffered a more crushing blow in May elections, with only one of the Villafuertes of Carmarines Sur winning a seat, and that winner defeated his grandfather, clan patriarch Luis. In the Zamboanga peninsula, the expansionist Jalosjos clan, which in 2010 spread from Zamboanga Norte to Zamboanga del Sur and Zamboanga Sibuguey, was rolled back to its one bastion of Dapitan City by allies of the president. Naturally, however, these allies were also established political families, such as the Hofers of Sibuguey and the Cerilles of Zamboanga del Sur.  One scion of a political clan, General Santos City mayor Darlene Antonino-Custodio, lost her re-election bid to a candidate supported by a nascent political force – boxing champion and Congressman Manny Pacquiao. An example of how new political families arise (almost half of all political clans originated after the restoration of electoral democracy in 1986), Pacquiao fielded his brother in another congressional race (the brother lost) and his wife, Jinkee, for vice-governor (she won).

Given this emphasis on families not political parties, on personalities not policy, we should view with skepticism any assertion that these election results, which do indeed demonstrate the continued popularity and drawing power of President Aquino, represent a surge for general reform. The organization of Philippine politics by clans and personalities makes it harder for the president to pursue his central theme of “if there is no corruption there is no poverty.” As explained by corruption scholar Michael Johnston, elections do induce uncertainty in political families (since they are not certain to win) who are appealing to citizens on the basis of favors and personal services. The incentive to accumulate irregular resources is increased since not only do they finance bids for power but they must be accumulated while in power:  “make hay while the sun shines,” as the saying goes. In this climate, where almost all politicking is conducted in this fashion, even anti-corruption efforts can be portrayed as “partisan,” as the insincere attempt by one faction to persecute another.

Reform is in fact possible in the Philippines. For example, the recent passage of tobacco tax increases in the teeth of fierce opposition of some in the industry, will allow better financing of health care for average citizens. But the more general question is, if politics is not changing, can governance patterns change in any sustainable fashion?  That is the topic of next week’s post.

Steven Rood is The Asia Foundation’s country representative in the Philippines. He can be reached at srood@asiafound.org. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the individual author and not those of The Asia Foundation.

View all posts by Steven Rood | Bio

Topics: | |

Countries:

6 comments on this post:

  1. Steven Rood:

    With regard to the peace process, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) has already announced plans to set up a political party for the 2016 elections (something the Moro National Liberation Front [MNLF] failed to do after their 1996 peace agreement with the Philippine Government.
    http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/416157/milf-plans-to-form-political-party

  2. As we witness the same names and faces in politics around the world, it’s not uncommon for family dynasties to continue.For example, just look at American politics such as: the Kennedy’s or the Bushes. Families with wealth and power have always had the upper hand vs. a better educated opponent that would do far better service to the public at hand. It’s not so much as to what you know as it is to WHO you know.

    Comment by John Guchone-Amplius Group

  3. The reality of the lasting power of dynasties in Philippine politics raises the question of whether the Mindanao peace process will be able to trigger the desired change towards stronger political parties in the Bangsamoro. This is certainly the purpose of the peace process. In 2016 traditional politicians and reformist politicians will either compete or, eventually, find a way of working together with a shared understanding of the need for gradual change in politics and governance. A challenge for the Bangsamoro. A reference for the whole of the Philippines.

  4. Steven Rood:

    Indeed, Marites Vitug in her piece
    http://positivelyfilipino.com/magazine/2013/5/the-elections-new-faces-and-old-truths
    described political party reform as one of the three “strategic” laws that need to be passed in the next congress.

    Twenty years ago I wrote in the Philippine Political Science Journal “Non-Government Organizations and the 1992 Philippine Elections” about the difficulties civil society organizations have in participating in electoral governance. Perhaps the passage of time has changed things?

  5. greg mariano jr:

    Let me share with you another article on this subject – “Filipino clans, celebrities dominate midterm polls” By Hrvoje Hranjski, Associated Press Published: May 13, 2013 – http://www.mb.com.ph/article.php?aid=11766&sid=1&subid=2#.UZWgJrWG2Sp.

    Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago “said that with 178 active dynasties, the Philippines is clearly the “world capital of political dynasties.” She said the proliferation of political dynasties is a result of the 13 years of deliberate inaction by legislators on anti-political dynasty bills. Of the country’s 80 provinces, 94 percent or 73 have political dynasties, she added.” – http://globalbalita.com/2013/03/02/miriam-phl-is-world-capital-of-dynasties/.

    I agree with you that reform is in fact possible in the Philippines. And I hope and pray that reforms for good governance can be made under the “Matuwid na Daan” principle of Pres. Pnoy and a proactive participation of all citizens. Please give me the link to your next week’s post on the subject – can governance patterns change in any sustainable fashion?

    Greg Mariano, Jr.
    Hollidaysburg, PA, USA

  6. Joseph Aquino:

    The possibility of electoral reform is not only dependent in the hands of the state-government but also in the development of civil society electoral institution and party building process.

    A multi-party formation, with resources for capacity building, for those principled organizations should be one among the major focus of innovative programs by funding and resource agencies – towards a more direct involvement to electoral reform intervention-support to institutional development of civil society organizations relative to electoral governance in between elections; so that the CSOs will become more allied to themselves in every elections rather than to those politicians who are against CSO participation in governance in between elections.

    The multi-party formation of principled CSOs shoud be locally developed at the level of every municipality or city.

Write a comment:

* Required

Comments are moderated. Please be polite and on-topic.

 characters available